Effective vs Ineffective Hedge?

I think the key is noting that
i) the company hedges the full 100 tonnes
ii) all 100 tonnes are used in the following year
iii) at year end the spot price is higher than the contract price
iv) the following year when the contract is settled the spot price is higher than the contract price

Given the above, the hedge can be considered fully effective as the 100 tonnes contract matches the 100 tonnes expected to be utilised and that the contract allows the company to purchase the coffee cheaper than it otherwise would in the spot market.

I’ve read this question a few times, and I’m not sure if this question has an effective and ineffective hedge aspect to it to be honest.

At the end of this year, all the distributor has is a futures contract that has increased in value (since coffee prices went up). Since you’d report a gain in the NI only if you sold the contract, the gain in value is therefore reported in OCI.

In the following year, the merchant exercises his futures contracts, purchases the coffee beans and sells them all in the same year. The profit gained from the sale would have included the gain in value from the futures contract (since the merchant would exercised the contract to purchase beans) and since the beans have been sold (and are not held as inventory) you would report it in NI.

That’s my take on it. Hope that helps 😀

But in this case it is not held-for-trading. RGH Corporation is a coffee distributor, the purchase of the coffee futures is to hedge against a possible rise of coffee (inventory) rather than with an intent to sell. But this is less relevant for this question as this is a hedge accounting question.

As @mattjuniper states, the futures can be assumed to be 100% effective as it is a direct hedge against a rise in coffee bean prices. The gain in the first year is therefore recognized in OCI (effective hedge).

In the second year, futures contract is exercised, coffee beans acquired and sold. Profit from sales is recognized in NI, not because it’s from an ineffective hedge, but rather because the gains has now been transferred to inventory, and profit from sales.

e.g. If the futures contract price was $50 per unit, and the spot price at time of exercise was $55, and if RGH sold it on as a distributor at $65, RGH made $5 more profit per unit of coffee beans than it would have had it not purchased a futures contract. But all $15 of profit would be reported in NI.

So as long as it is a cash flow hedge, as long as the exercise and sale has not occurred, any gains will be reported in OCI, and once it has been exercised it will depend on what the gain has been translated to. E.g. in this case if the merchant did not manage to sell any of the stock they acquired through the futures contract, there would be no profit reported until this happens.

No problem! If you want to group the other 2 questions here go right ahead @vincentt

I’ll be honest, I dug out last years L2 text book before answering and managed to find a paragraph, that was it. Was also in a different SS, so unsure whether it’s one of the bits they have significantly changed this year?

I’ll be honest, I dug out last years L2 text book before answering and managed to find a paragraph, that was it. Was also in a different SS, so unsure whether it’s one of the bits they have significantly changed this year?

Points for dedication!

I think they do it to separate the men from the boys. Some questions they ask are based on topics that were covered in a couple of sentences and almost swept under the carpet, but it’s these questions that really highlight the excellent candidates from the good candidates (or the lucky from the not-so-lucky?!?)

Some of them are just evil, from what I remember. BTW @vincentt was there a detailed answer for the question from Schweser?

woohoo – matches my answer! 🙂