Richard Frizell, CFA has recently completed his research report on Lukesrun, Inc. and he is generally favorable on the stock. The report shows a preliminary “buy” on Lukesrun. Frizell’s supervisor approves the report, and it is being reading for distribution. Frizell recently came across some negative information on the company (publicly available information) and meets with his supervisor. The supervisor advises to go ahead and issue the preliminary report, with no mention of the new negative information. What should Frizell do, in order to properly comply with the Standards?
- Frizell should notify all clients of the additional information on Lukesrun.
- Frizell is in full compliance of the Standards since the added information
was publicly available.
- Insist that the report be revised, and if that is not done, he should
request to have his name removed from the report.
The relevant Standard is:
V(A) Diligence and Reasonable Basis
and Candidates must:
diligence, independence, and thoroughness in analyzing investments, making
investment recommendations, and taking investment actions.
reasonable and adequate basis, supported by appropriate research and
investigation, for any investment analysis, recommendation, or action.
The report needs to be revised. It
is not sufficient to just notify clients. The report will be publicly available
and it is not accurate. This is also likely a violation of Standard IV(C)
Responsibilities of Supervisors. In order to properly comply with Standard
V(A), diligence and thoroughness must be exercised in preparing analysis and
recommendations. Frizell has done this.
Frizell should document his difference in opinion, and request that his name be
removed from the report.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.