- This topic has 10 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated Apr-177:36 am by Gary.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
Up::2
The question is as follows:
You are using the Treynor-Black Model for security selection. The optimal portfolio consists 40% of actively managed portfolio with an expected return of 10%. The rest is allocated to the indexed portfolio, which has an expected return of 6%. Your client’s requirements are for a portfolio that has an expected return of 10%. Which of the following is the ideal way to achieve this?
A Allocate 100% of the client’s funds to the active portfolio
B Allocate 100% of client’s funds to the indexed portfolio and borrow money to leverage
C Keep the optimal portfolio allocation the same and leverage the optimal portfolio by borrowing.Based on my understanding, if 40/60 is the optimum portfolio which would only produce an expected return of 7.6%, you have to alter the weightings towards the actively managed portfolio, but the point is if 40/60 is the optimum how would I be able to adjust it?
-
Up::5
@reena yup the right answer is C, but what does ‘leverage the optimal portfolio by borrowing’ means?
From my understanding, that means to invest the funds from shorting the 60% indexed portfolio to the actively managed portfolio?
How would you be able to benefit from diversifying in the indexed portfolio?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Up::2
@vincentt – I’d think leverage here means borrowing money to fund the optimal portfolio, which would amplify it’s returns.
Compare a case where an investor borrowed 50% of the money to fund an initial $100 optimal portfolio. And say the optimal portfolio appreciated by 10%.
Unleveraged return = ($110-$100) / $100 x 100 = 10%
Leveraged return = ($110-$100) / $50 x 100= 20%His leveraged return doubled when he borrowed 50%. Of course the opposite is true if the price fell. Note that this simple example has not adjusted for the cost of borrowing that money, which would slightly reduce the leveraged return %.
-
Up::1
Hmm… I would have thought the optimum portfolio remains the same. You are not changing the composition % of it by borrowing the money. you are just amplifying potential return (upsides and downsides) of it by borrowing money.
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.