- This topic has 8 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated Jul-172:26 pm by
.
-
Posts
-
-
Up4
Yes, I think that’s consistent with my thinking. Say, if you take Econ 101, then you have covered part of what’s needed in Level 1 Econ.
-
Up4
Yes, by studying Level 1 Econ you can be sure to cover all of Econ 101. But if you only study Econ 101, you’ll need more to cover all of Econ Level 1. In other words, Econ 101 is a subset of Level 1 Econ.
-
Up3
@edulima It’s true the other way round also , Right? If I study Level 1 Econ , I automatically cover everything in Econ 101.
The essence of me asking this is that I never took anything like Econ 101. So studying Level 1 Econ would the start off with the basics but will get broader and deeper? If this is the case it’s perfect for me. -
-
-
-
-
Up0
Hi @k10111v, I would say it’s more than Econ 101; that is, broader and deeper. It covers a lot of material, including Microecon (demand/supply, consumer demand, theory of the firm, market structure), Macroecon (aggregate output, business cycles, fiscal & monetary policy) and International Econ (trade, currency exchange). The level is also pretty deep in concepts, but no calculus is needed. I don’t think there’s a pre-requisite other than resilience in trying to understand all the material. Hope this helps!
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.