Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Item sets – answering strategies #67546Up::6
I tend to skim the paragraph (literally 10-20 seconds) to see what the vignette is about, then go through the questions, then go back to the vignette again. Works well for me.
Sometimes in the first few seconds I find out it’s a topic I’d rather get back to later, I just skip that whole vignette 😀
in reply to: If God was A Banker – Ravi Subramanian #67925in reply to: how’s everyone’s progress? #67002in reply to: Temporal and Current Rate Method #67772in reply to: Level 3 Candidates #68442Up::5That’s true. I guess I’m more glass half empty – I’m suspicious of the remaining failing 40%… if they’ve managed Level 2, what made them fail Level 3?
in reply to: Competition of the Week – taking suggestions! #71534in reply to: LIFO Reserve Adjustments #76884Up::5It’s to do with the differences in LIFO vs FIFO – best way is to run through an example. The ‘subtract change in LIFO reserve’ method is a simplification of the total calculations needed, as elaborated below.
Example:
Company ABC uses LIFO.
Year-end inventory = $2m
Beginning inventory = $3m
LIFO reserve at year-end = $1m
LIFO reserve at the beginning of the years = $500,000
COSG = $5mSimple way to convert LIFO to FIFO
COGS (FIFO) = COGS (LIFO) – change in LIFO reserve
COGS (FIFO) = $5m – ($1m – $0.5m) = $4.5mComplex way
Purchases = ending inventory – beginning inventory + COGS (LIFO)
Purchases = $2m – 3m + $5m = $4mEnding inventory (FIFO) = ending inventory (LIFO) + ending period LIFO reserve
Ending inventory (FIFO) = $2m + $1m = $3mBeginning inventory (FIFO) = beginning inventory (LIFO) + beginning LIFO reserve
Beginning inventory (FIFO) = $3m + $0.5m = $3.5mCOGS (FIFO) = purchases + beginning inventory (FIFO) – ending inventory (FIFO)
COGS (FIFO) = $4m + $3.5m – $3m = $4.5min reply to: Are study groups useful? #67003Up::4Didn’t have any study buddies either for level 1, but I did for level 2. I think it’s useful to have a buddy but not necessarily to discuss all the time. Just someone to make sure you both are studying, and if you need to clarify occasional concepts.
Up::4With Level 3 the crap I get is ‘come on, last one! you’ve already passed 2, this one is a piece of cake!’ and so on.
I feel CFA is just one of those professional exams. No one can really understand what you have gone through unless they have given the exam themselves. Only a CFA can understand what it takes to clear the exams, and what it means to the candidates.
I definitely agree! @ajfinance!
in reply to: There should be a Level 2 and 3 in December too. #67687Up::4I think the current things that might be preventing this from happening is:
1. There aren’t too many Level 2 and 3 candidates here. There is a ‘candidate funnel’ where there’s a huge number of Level 1s, hence the need for 2 sessions. If they split Level 2 and 3 too, they need to set a new set of exams, fly the examiners over another time, etc etc. Too messy.
2. Might be a way to control CFA charterholder numbers. After all, you only get to full CFA after passing Level 3, so as long as they control level 3 numbers and frequency they’re fine.
in reply to: Liar’s Poker – Michael Lewis #67776Up::4The ‘start of your financial career’ classic. The description of his first finance interview was hilarious.
in reply to: There should be a Level 2 and 3 in December too. #67924Up::4I’d be annoyed if they offered level 2 and 3 twice a year. I don’t think I could clear all the levels back to back in one go.
But you’d be tempted to try? 😀
in reply to: Level 3 Candidates #68060Up::4Yep – I’m rather enjoying the readings actually, much more than Level 1 or 2. The investment biases are great 😀
in reply to: Up-skilling colleagues in FRA #68406Up::4@Mattjuniper I do the same thing at my firm – basic classes to HR and support. It’s a great way to practice, and also a great way to meet new people 😀
in reply to: 300 Hours drinks straight after exam? #68443Up::4That is pretty legend. I’ve heard of Level 3 candidates not bothering with a calculator, but that makes a bit more sense since there’s less calculation. Going into Level 1 or 2 without a calculator is suicide.
Having said that, even if you were confident of your abilities, going in without a calculator is just not smart. Even if you were Bruce Lee you wouldn’t walk in unarmed into war, for example.
Unless you were this guy.
in reply to: Mourning Mondays! #68721in reply to: Winners this week – @Diya, @Marc, @SidMenon! #68722 -
AuthorPosts