::
Often they write questions that seem like WTF (official word in the Oxford dictionary now). I often read the end of the question first where they ask, has this person violated this specific standard or the standard in general. You can get multiple violations however the specific question may relate to a standard they have not violated. With a question like yours it’s safe to assume there were red flags in multiple places and they violated the standard in general. Also, im pretty sure in Quants it states 36 observations for a large enough example size. You can view investments on ticks but this person seems like a passive investor and a 1yr return wouldn’t be enough to change strategies alone.