CFA CFA Level 1 Labor, capital and technology

Labor, capital and technology

  • This topic has 11 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated Feb-2410:41 am by ajost14.
  • Author
    Posts
    • Up
      3
      ::

      And as you can see, @MattJuniper beat me to it!

    • Up
      3
      ::

      Technology, then, would always have a larger impact on potential growth to GDP than either labor or capital alone? I guess that concept is what threw me off, that and all the percentages being thrown around, haha.

    • Up
      2
      ::

      You’re very welcome!

      Without getting too much into it, as I fear that my subpar teaching skills might confuse you, the basic premise is this:

      GDP is a function of labor, capital, and technology.

      Technological progress enhances the productivity of both capital and labor.

      As is such, technology has a larger impact on potential GDP growth than either labor or capital alone.


      @ajost14

    • Avatar of SnippySnippy
      Participant
        • CFA Level 2
        Up
        2
        ::

        @MattJuniper I worked it out too a couple of days back 😛

      • Up
        2
        ::

        @diya I think I just worked out what your special Snr PM ability is 😉


        @MattyJ
        It took me awhile to figure out all my special abilities. I have more :p

      • Up
        1
        ::

        @diya I think I just worked out what your special Snr PM ability is 😉

      • Up
        0
        ::

        This is straight forward to see if you substitute 1% in for each of the three growth variables (technology, labour and capital) whilst holding the other two factors at 0 (and thus seeing the exact amount of effect each has on GDP). The question states that WL = 0.6, and so WC = 1 – 0.6 = 0.4.

        So, given the above, the equation gan be rewritten as follows:

        Growth in GDP = (growth in technology) + (0.6)(growth in labour) + (0.4)(growth in capital)

        Scenario 1: Tech Growth = 1%, Labour Growth = 0%, Capital Growth = 0%
        Growth in GDP = (1%) + (0.6)(0%) + (0.4)(0%) = 1%

        Scenario 2: Tech Growth = 0%, Labour Growth = 1%, Capital Growth = 0%
        Growth in GDP = (0%) + (0.6)(1%) + (0.4)(0%) = 0.6%

        Scenario 3: Tech Growth = 0%, Labour Growth = 0%, Capital Growth = 1%
        Growth in GDP = (0%) + (0.6)(0%) + (0.4)(1%) = 0.4%

        So you can see that a 1% increase in technology has a bigger impact than a 1% increase in either labour or capital, and this is due to the weighting factors for bothe being less than 1.

        Hope that makes sense!

      • Up
        0
        ::

        If I’m looking at it right, it should simply be due to the fact that the full % of technology growth would contribute to “Growth in potential GDP.”

        So for example, if you were to increase each factor by 1%

        Technology would contribute 1% to potential GDP
        Labor growth would contribute 1% x 60% = 0.60% to potential GDP
        Capital growth would contribute 1% x 40% = 0.40% to potential GDP

        As you can see, if you were to increase any of these sources of economic growth by 1%, technology will contribute the the most to potential GDP.

      • Up
        0
        ::

        @dollarstodonuts but your answer was more efficient 😀

      • Up
        0
        ::

        I suppose you could have a hypothetical scenario where WL was 1 and WC was 0 and theme there would be two possible answers…:D

      • Up
        0
        ::

        Fair enough. Thanks for explaining @MattJuniper and @DollarsToDonuts!

    Viewing 10 reply threads
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.