- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated Oct-174:44 pm by
kredman.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
Up::3
Thanks Sophie, I really appreciate your thoughts.
Your right it is a means to an end as the CF roles I found did not work in terms of the client base or location. However I couldn’t put up with audit too much longer so moved into valuations where I hoped the skills might help me land a CF type role in London in the future (only the regions will give me a shot straight from audit and my other half wants to live in London) whilst keeping my options open for other roles if my mind changes.
-
Up::2
Hello @kredman‌, good to have you join us!
Congrats on the ACA qualification, it’s definitely not easy.
My first question to you is if you enjoy transactions, why not corporate finance, instead of valuations? It seems like going to valuations is a means to an end (based on your comments), and so I’m slightly confused as to the target here? That said, it’s OK to not know what you want to do yet as you explore various paths. @BeanCounter‌ is also a qualified Chartered Accountant and a CFA candidate, he recently shared his views about taking the CFA (from an accountant’s perspective) in this article.
If that helps, I used to be in corporate finance and found that Level 2 CFA materials are extremely helpful for me in work, as I didn’t study finance in depth previously (just Economics). CFA isn’t just for asset management and equity/credit research, I think it provides excellent fundamentals to work in finance. Corporate finance or ‘transactions based’ role are all about exchange of value of assets, which involves some form of asset valuation anyway (whether it’s company’s, divisions, or any other asset classes) – all which requires some foundation in asset valuation taught in the CFA course.
So in short, yes it’s useful for your particular career objectives and the desire to keep your options open. Hope this helps!
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.